爽死777影院的网址,三级片网站免费看中文字幕,色欲天天婬香婬色视频,美女mm131暴爽毛片韩国

China Justice Observer

中司觀察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Supreme Court Issues New Policy for Copyright Protection

Sat, 16 Jan 2021
Categories: Insights

avatar

 

On 16 Nov. 2020, China’s Supreme People's Court (SPC) promulgated the Opinions on Strengthening the Protection of Copyright and Copyright-Related Rights (關(guān)于加強(qiáng)著作權(quán)和與著作權(quán)有關(guān)的權(quán)利保護(hù)的意見), further clarifying how Chinese courts will protect copyright in litigation.

The highlights of the Opinions are as follows:

1. The court allows the parties to preserve, fix and submit evidence by blockchain and other means.

2. The natural person, legal entity or other organization whose name is affixed to a work, performance or sound recording in a common way, shall be presumed to be the copyright owner thereof or have copyright-related rights in such work, performance or sound recording, unless there is sufficient evidence to the contrary to invalidate the fact. 

3. In the proceedings, if the defendant claims that he/she is not liable for infringement, he/she shall provide evidence to prove that the right holder has granted permission or that the work can be used without the right holder's permission as stipulated in the Copyright Law.

4. The court will study how to determine the copyright of achievements related to the Internet, artificial intelligence, big data and other technologies. 

5. The court will explore how to hear new types of cases concerning live streaming of sports events, live streaming of online games, and data infringement, etc.

6. If the parties request the immediate destruction of the infringing reproductions and the related manufacturing tools, the court shall support the request in the civil proceedings, and shall order the destruction ex officio in the criminal proceedings. In criminal proceedings, for the reason of preserving evidence for subsequent civil or administrative proceedings that may be initiated, the court may support the right holder's request to suspend the destruction of the infringing reproductions as well as related materials and tools.

7. The court may rule that the infringer indemnifies the reasonable expenses incurred in safeguarding copyright, including court costs and attorney's fees.

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

SPP Publishes First IP Crime Prosecution White Paper

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released a white paper on IP crime prosecution, highlighting the rise in IP crime cases from 2021 to 2023 and significant cases in emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Top 10 IP Cases (2023)

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released the top 10 IP cases and 50 typical IP cases of 2023, emphasizing the protection of IP rights, including a notable ruling on Siemens trademark infringement and unfair competition.

SPC Unveils 2023 IP Protection Report

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court(SPC) released its 2023 report on intellectual property protection, highlighting a 3.41% increase in accepted cases, and a 117% rise in punitive damages awarded.

Decoding the Turning Point: A Closer Look at China’s Recognition of Japanese Bankruptcy

This follow-up article focuses on the Chinese Court's detailed review of the Shanghai International Corporation case in 2023, highlighting the significance of reciprocity in cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and underscoring China's evolving approach to recognizing foreign judgments (See In re Shanghai International Corporation (2021) Hu 03 Xie Wai Ren No.1).

SPC Interprets International Treaties & Practices in Chinese Courts

In December 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) reaffirmed the supremacy of international treaties over domestic laws in foreign-related civil and commercial cases with its “Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of International Treaties and International Practices”(關(guān)于審理涉外民商事案件適用國(guó)際條約和國(guó)際慣例若干問題的解釋).