爽死777影院的网址,三级片网站免费看中文字幕,色欲天天婬香婬色视频,美女mm131暴爽毛片韩国

China Justice Observer

中司觀察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Ministry of Civil Affairs Modifies Divorce Registration Procedures - China Legal News

Thu, 07 Jan 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

avatar

 

China’s first Civil Code, issued in May 2020, introduced a new divorce procedure, i.e., a cooling-off period for divorce. Divorce registration procedures were modified accordingly.

As the Civil Code of China enters into force as of 1 Jan. 2021, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, which is responsible for formulating marriage registration policies, promulgated the Circular on Implementing the Provisions on Marriage Registration in the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (關于貫徹落實<中華人民共和國民法典>中有關婚姻登記規定的通知, Min Fa [2020] No.116), making the following adjustments to marriage-related registration, especially divorce procedures, etc.

1. Within 30 days after the marriage registration authority receives the application for divorce registration and issues the Receipt of Accepting the Application for Divorce Registration (the Receipt) to the parties concerned, either party who does not want to get divorced may, by presenting his/her valid identity card and the Receipt, withdraw the application for divorce registration to the said marriage registration authority.

Where both parties fail to jointly apply to the marriage registration authority for the issuance of a divorce certificate within 30 days upon the expiration of the cooling-off period for divorce, the divorce registration application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

2. Marriage registration authorities shall establish divorce registration archives and formulate the archives in an electronic form.

Contributors: Yanru Chen 陳彥茹

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

China Regulates Internet Unfair Competition

In May 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation introduced the "Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet," effective September 1, 2024, to address issues like fake reviews and data scraping, aiming to ensure fair competition and protect users and operators in the digital economy.

China Enacts Tariff Law

In April 2024, China's legislature adopted the Tariff Law, effective December 1, 2024, establishing the legislative framework for tariff administration and clarifying tariff authorities, payers, exemptions, and preferential policies.

China Enacts Academic Degrees Law

China's legislature passed the Academic Degrees Law to regulate degree granting, ensure degree quality, and protect the rights of degree applicants, effective January 1, 2025.

China Publishes Typical Cases to Protect Women and Children

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate, alongside other organizations, released 12 typical cases to guide courts in strictly punishing crimes against women and children and to encourage victims to seek legal protection.

SPP Publishes First IP Crime Prosecution White Paper

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released a white paper on IP crime prosecution, highlighting the rise in IP crime cases from 2021 to 2023 and significant cases in emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Top 10 IP Cases (2023)

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released the top 10 IP cases and 50 typical IP cases of 2023, emphasizing the protection of IP rights, including a notable ruling on Siemens trademark infringement and unfair competition.