爽死777影院的网址,三级片网站免费看中文字幕,色欲天天婬香婬色视频,美女mm131暴爽毛片韩国

China Justice Observer

中司觀察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China to Regulate Commercial Cryptography

Mon, 17 Jul 2023
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 27 Apr. 2023, China’s State Council issued the revised “Regulation on the Administration of Commercial Cryptography” (hereinafter the “Regulation”, 商用密碼管理條例).

Commercial cryptography refers to the technologies, products, and services that provide encryption-based protection and security certification of the information that is not state secret.

According to China’s Cryptography Law (中國密碼法), the Chinese government classifies cryptography and divides it into core cryptography, ordinary cryptography, and commercial cryptography.

Core and ordinary cryptography are used to protect state secret information.

Commercial cryptography is used to secure information other than state secrets. For instance, a citizen, enterprise, or other organization may use commercial cryptography to protect cyber and information security.

According to this Regulation:

  • Commercial cryptography that involves national security, social and public interests, and has the function of encryption-based protection shall be included in the list of commercial cryptography subject to import license and be subject to import licensing.
  • Commercial cryptography that involves national security, social and public interests, or in which China undertakes international obligations shall be included in the export control list of commercial cryptography and be subject to export control.
  • Commercial cryptography used in mass consumer products is not subject to import licensing or export control.

 

 

Photo by Gbenga Onalaja on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

China Regulates Internet Unfair Competition

In May 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation introduced the "Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet," effective September 1, 2024, to address issues like fake reviews and data scraping, aiming to ensure fair competition and protect users and operators in the digital economy.

China Enacts Tariff Law

In April 2024, China's legislature adopted the Tariff Law, effective December 1, 2024, establishing the legislative framework for tariff administration and clarifying tariff authorities, payers, exemptions, and preferential policies.

China Enacts Academic Degrees Law

China's legislature passed the Academic Degrees Law to regulate degree granting, ensure degree quality, and protect the rights of degree applicants, effective January 1, 2025.

China Publishes Typical Cases to Protect Women and Children

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate, alongside other organizations, released 12 typical cases to guide courts in strictly punishing crimes against women and children and to encourage victims to seek legal protection.

SPP Publishes First IP Crime Prosecution White Paper

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released a white paper on IP crime prosecution, highlighting the rise in IP crime cases from 2021 to 2023 and significant cases in emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Top 10 IP Cases (2023)

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released the top 10 IP cases and 50 typical IP cases of 2023, emphasizing the protection of IP rights, including a notable ruling on Siemens trademark infringement and unfair competition.