爽死777影院的网址,三级片网站免费看中文字幕,色欲天天婬香婬色视频,美女mm131暴爽毛片韩国

China Justice Observer

中司觀察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

China Prohibits Paying Salaries in Virtual Currency

Mon, 15 Aug 2022
Categories: China Legal Trends

In July 2022, the Chaoyang Primary People’s Court of Beijing (the “Court”) ruled in a labor dispute that companies should not pay wages in virtual currency.

In the first-instance judgment, the Court held that the company should pay more than CNY 270,000 of salary and bonus to the employee Mr. Shen in Chinese currency (Renminbi).

This dispute arose from Shen’s disagreement with the company’s payment in the form of virtual currency. After the company was deregistered, Shen sued its shareholders, Hu and Deng, for his salary, performance bonus, and overtime pay.

The Court held that according to the PRC Labor Law, wages should be paid monthly to laborers themselves in the form of currency. In addition, Article 5 of the “Interim Provisions on Wage Payment” (工資支付暫行規定) provides that wages shall be paid in legal tender and shall not be paid in the form of allowances in kind or negotiable securities instead of currency.

According to the Law on the People’s Bank of China (中國人民銀行法), China’s legal tender is the Renminbi (RMB). The “Notice on Further Preventing and Resolving the Risk of Virtual Currency Trading and Speculation” (關于進一步防范和處置虛擬貨幣交易炒作風險的通知) issued in 2021 specifies that virtual currencies do not have the same legal status as legal tender and that virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, ETH and USDT are not legal tender, and should not and cannot be circulated as currency in the market.

Related Posts:

Does Chinese Court approve Bitcoin Exchanges?

Chinese Court Confirms Bitcoin as Virtual Commodity

 


Cover Photo by Sting Du on Unsplash

 

 

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

China Regulates Internet Unfair Competition

In May 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation introduced the "Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet," effective September 1, 2024, to address issues like fake reviews and data scraping, aiming to ensure fair competition and protect users and operators in the digital economy.

China Enacts Tariff Law

In April 2024, China's legislature adopted the Tariff Law, effective December 1, 2024, establishing the legislative framework for tariff administration and clarifying tariff authorities, payers, exemptions, and preferential policies.

China Enacts Academic Degrees Law

China's legislature passed the Academic Degrees Law to regulate degree granting, ensure degree quality, and protect the rights of degree applicants, effective January 1, 2025.

China Publishes Typical Cases to Protect Women and Children

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate, alongside other organizations, released 12 typical cases to guide courts in strictly punishing crimes against women and children and to encourage victims to seek legal protection.

SPP Publishes First IP Crime Prosecution White Paper

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) released a white paper on IP crime prosecution, highlighting the rise in IP crime cases from 2021 to 2023 and significant cases in emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Top 10 IP Cases (2023)

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released the top 10 IP cases and 50 typical IP cases of 2023, emphasizing the protection of IP rights, including a notable ruling on Siemens trademark infringement and unfair competition.