爽死777影院的网址,三级片网站免费看中文字幕,色欲天天婬香婬色视频,美女mm131暴爽毛片韩国

China Justice Observer

中司觀察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Beijing Court Issues Guidelines on Evidence Rules in IPR Civil Litigation

Wed, 26 May 2021
Categories: China Legal Trends

On 22 Apr. 2021, Beijing High People's Court held a press conference on trial work of intellectual property rights (IPR) cases in Beijing courts, and issued the “Guidelines of Beijing High People's Court on Evidence Rules Evidence in Civil Litigation of Intellectual Property Rights (北京市高級人民法院知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事訴訟證據(jù)規(guī)則指引).

The Guidelines contains six parts, which provide guidance on the presentation of evidence for disputes over infringement of patent rights, copyrights, trademarks, and unfair competition, apart from the General Provisions and Supplementary Provisions. The Guidelines aims to ensure the accurate application of the “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Litigation of Intellectual Property Rights (關(guān)于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定) issued by China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).

The Guidelines set out provisions in line with the latest development of forensic technologies. According to the Guidelines, information carriers based on new technologies that reflect the facts of a case, such as evidence kept by a third party and evidence formed by blockchain technology, could be provided by the parties as evidence. For such evidence, the court shall, in the light of the formation process, expression form and the content of evidence as well as the characteristics of new technologies, comprehensively determine the authenticity and reliability of the information it carries and its relevance to the case, so as to decide the evidentiary weight thereof. Furthermore, for notary preservation or blockchain deposition preservation, the electronic data in the information network environment should be examined in terms of the production process of notary documents, the generation process of blockchain deposition records, the formation process of the web page and its release time, the qualification and credit status of the website managing the web page, the technical means adopted for notarization, and the technical environment of blockchain deposition.

 

 

Cover Photo by vnwayne fan (https://unsplash.com/@vnwayne) on Unsplash

Contributors: CJO Staff Contributors Team

Save as PDF

You might also like

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Yellow River Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released typical cases demonstrating judicial efforts to protect the Yellow River Basin's ecology, coinciding with the first anniversary of the Yellow River Protection Law.

MPS: China Crushes Myanmar Crime Syndicates

In May 2024, China’s Ministry of Public Security (MPS) announced that major crime syndicates in northern Myanmar have been dismantled since 2023, repatriating over 49,000 telecom fraud suspects and significantly curbing fraud-related crimes.

SPC Releases Typical Labor Dispute Cases

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released six typical cases on labor disputes to guide similar cases, emphasizing worker rights and clarifying limitations on non-compete agreements.

China Cracks Down on Securities and Futures Violations

In May 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court, Supreme People’s Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security, and China Securities Regulatory Commission jointly issued new regulations to intensify enforcement against securities and futures violations, integrating administrative and criminal justice measures to protect market integrity.

First Thai Monetary Judgment Enforced in China, Highlighting Presumptive Reciprocity in China-ASEAN Region

In 2024, a local Chinese court in Nanning, Guangxi, ruled to recognize and enforce a Thai monetary judgment. Apart from being the first case of enforcing Thai monetary judgments in China, it is also the first publicly reported case confirming a reciprocal relationship based on “presumptive reciprocity” (Guangxi Nanning China Travel Service Co., Ltd. v. Orient Thai Airlines Co., Ltd. (2023) Gui 71 Xie Wai Ren No. 1).

China Regulates Internet Unfair Competition

In May 2024, China’s State Administration for Market Regulation introduced the "Interim Provisions on Anti-Unfair Competition on the Internet," effective September 1, 2024, to address issues like fake reviews and data scraping, aiming to ensure fair competition and protect users and operators in the digital economy.

China Enacts Tariff Law

In April 2024, China's legislature adopted the Tariff Law, effective December 1, 2024, establishing the legislative framework for tariff administration and clarifying tariff authorities, payers, exemptions, and preferential policies.